Christoph Metzelder User Offline Christoph Metzelder
Dortmund,
Germany
Level 1 Supporter Profil Level 50%
Date: February 12, 2007

Interview with Christoph Metzelder


Christoph Metzelder and Alex Goerlach
 

After an injury in the past year you have returned to the playing field. How are things now?
 
Thanks, I’m doing well again and happy that I can play again. I’m grateful in every respect to my doctors and other assistants.
In the period of recuperating from your injury you became involved in the Club of Pioneers. That sounds like being ill is a good condition for thinking about climate protection and sustainability.
 
I don’t really think that there is a connection between the two. Climate protection is a subject for me whether I am healthy or sick. To be sure, when you are forced to slow down because of an injury, then there is more time to think about yourself and your life.
 
It doesn’t really belong to the main task of a competitive athlete to discuss issues of environmental protection…
 
This topic should concern all of us! Since I began blogging for the Club of Pioneers in December, amazing things have happened. The topic of climate change and how to combat it is resounding everywhere. The climate conference of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in Paris at the beginning of February has shown that we have no more time to postpone solutions till some later date.
 
What can athletes and other prominent people like you do?

In general we have many fans and even a whole string of fan clubs. Those are the forums in which I can arouse attention to the subjects that are important to me. In my Web site www.metzelder.de there is, for example, a link to the Club of Pioneers. And so, many of my fans come in contact with my blog at Club of Pioneers and are confronted with my way of thinking and position on these matters.
 
Are you able to come to terms with the idea of “sustainable lifestyle”?
 
I think that most people – including myself – do not want to abandon their standard of living. But at the same time they don’t want to enjoy their lifestyle at the expense of God's creation or the coming generation. Technical progress is in principle positive, but it must be used responsibly. I view this in the exact same way. This has nothing to do with a particular political opinion, but with rationality.
 
Can you give us an example?
 
For instance, driving a car. I like to be mobile and really enjoy the technology of a car, also a certain amount of comfort and good design. But a car must be eco-friendly. Therefore I am interested in alternative forms of combustion and would be delighted to test drive the BMW Hydrogen 7 model.
 
Is climate protection the only area in which you are involved?
 
I am also involved in the area of work with underprivileged children and youth. For me it is important to be able to offer a perspective to the upcoming generation. We need to make it possible for boys and girls to develop their abilities in school and training and to play a part in society. But for that to happen, we need to turn a world over to them in which they can live naturally and without detriment. To me both of these areas belong together.
 
Interview: Alex Goerlach
 

Rate this Post
9 Ratings
 
 
Comments

Comments

At 5:14 AM, February 14, 2007, Anke Herder said...
all honesty nobody really wants to give up their comfortable
lifestyle - and does not necessarily have to! Raising awareness
will increase the pressure to look for "clean" and at the same
time sexy solutions. And who is better qualified then prominent
people like Christoph Metzelder to raise their voice and spread
the word...two thumbs up for speaking up and taking action!
At 11:34 AM, February 14, 2007, vggruen said...
I dont want to reply the discussion we had here at the beginning
of the year, but i think it is important to say that now it is
not enough to talk about sustainablity. I think naturally it is
good to make the lobby for the ecology greater and greater and so
it is also important to make ecological investations, but we now
after the new studies of the UN must say that we must also
discuss the lifestyle in our first world. I think we have to
give up our comfortable lifestyle . It is really necessary to go
for a weekend trip to London. @metze: and to want to say here
Don´t fly or somethink like that. I think this is a debate we
must talk about . It includes a debatte about ideas like taxing
the oil for planes or f.e. the developments of miniairports like
dortmund .
At 1:58 PM, February 17, 2007, AnnaSc02 said...
It's so true that most of us are unwilling to give up the
comforts of our lifestyles. It actually is perceived as a kind of
a nuisance to do so. But once we get over the idea that the
quality of our lives will decrease because of it, we can make a
big difference. It really starts with each and every individual
and making the right choices on daily basis. Also, teaching the
younger generation RESPECT and responsibility to me is key in
making a difference. But until we, the current generation, fully
embrace the idea and actually begin to implement it, we are all
just talking the talk.
At 7:05 AM, February 18, 2007, Alexander Goerlach said...
I couldn't agree more with AnnaSc02 - respect and responsibility
are the basis. However the capacity of understanding the
environmental topics and to have the time to think about this
stuff you need a certain level of education - and standard of
living. We know that the process of thinking about environment
starts once people have reached a certain lifestyle. Sad as it
might be, but this is what surveys tell us.
At 10:48 AM, February 21, 2007, vggruen said...
Alex, i think it is dangerous to think that only our
high-developing countries are able to support the idea of
environment politics; beside i think it is important to
distinguish between the niveau of education and the comfortable
mobile lifestyle. I believe we can agree that education is the
key of the future namely for the whole world, but i think it is
also important that we ( the first world) shows that qualitative
growth with ecological and social responsibility is possible. I
would ask, how we can forbid the chinese drive cars if we
ourselves hat 2-3 cars per family. That´s not fair. I would take
up Anna´s and Metzes idea of teaching the younger generation
Respect and responsibility and would go still further; we need a
new definition of quality of our lives; because we also know from
the economics that after a period of growth a big bang will
follow. If we define our Life quality not only higher, faster
and further, but show that simple lifestyle is also with an
quality. This could be an example for the other countries.
Another point is that we must have a long breath: f.e biological
products has a long time problems to selling well even in the
green milieu and now in 2007 we have in Germany such a great
interesting that the german farmes can´t produce so much
biological products. Naturally it is so that sustainable
lifestyle also needs a financial basis but the most problems with
CO² Emissions we have not by the poor but by the rich; therefore
we Rich of the world have an worldwide resonsibility for
justice.
At 8:08 PM, February 24, 2007, Alexander Goerlach said...
Verena, nobody said that only high-developing countries are able
to support the idea of environment politics.
At 6:22 AM, February 25, 2007, vggruen said...
I have understand you so; if not it is good, but you have said "
We know that the process of thinking about environment starts
once people have reached a certain lifestyle." it shows us that
we must unite the themes ecology and social. we must ask us how
even people from armer population can be sensitived to the
environment problems. I think one theme could be energy-saving.
A theme what have to become more appeal
 
Post a comment

Post a comment

Your comment