Date: May 07, 2007
Carbon Capture and Storage – a key technology to a sustainable reduction of CO2-emissions?


Animated picture of a Carbon Storage system
Comments |
At 1:52 PM, May 08, 2007, walterallenhaxton said...
I think that Carbon Capture and Storage is a fake solution.Eventually earth movements will release any co^2 that is stored
in this manner. This pushes the problem off in to the future
which might have some value but since we don't know when it will
come popping back up out of the ground we might be creating a
serious problem for the future. There is a lake in Africa
that does this naturally. Once in a while some of the CO^2 comes
up and kills a lot of people down stream. A better solution
would be to not use carbon based fuels. The universe uses
fusion power. We could use that or fission power. A great
way to store wind and other intermittent sources of power is
Hydrogen. It has many uses. I don't see why tidal power
needs to be restricted to the shore. There are tides over the
whole surface of the ocean. Of course harnessing sources like
that would require Hydrogen storage. Methane is a problem
too. Capturing it before it reaches the atmosphere and using it
as a fuel would create a bigger difference than CO^2 would. I
heard that it is 200 times as potent a greenhouse gas as CO^2.
Another idea just popped into my head. What about wave power.
They are all over the ocean. Harvesting that power would create a
tremendous amount of Hydrogen.
At 1:06 PM, May 16, 2007, Greennovator said...
I agree with walter that this type of CSS is a waste of resorces.A far more viable carbon sequestration solution is "terra
preta". Google it or goto www.eprida.com for a look at a company
with amazing potential. Locking carbon up in the soil increases
moisture retention and increases crop yields (and thus CO2
absorption) thru natural microbial processes. As far as
methane goes, it has 21 times CO2's heat trapping potential, not
200. We definitely need more biogas systems for organic wastes
to keep the CH4 out of the atmosphere. Wave power has already
come a long way, with full scale test systems of the coast of
Portugal and Scotland. Hydrogen has a long way to go as an
energy storage medium (infrastructure, fuelcells, etc.) Fusion
(our Sun) is a far better option than fission, but I know that
the latter will probably needed in the interim until we can fully
transition to the truly renewable sources of
energy. Conservation must come with or before these changes as
I have told my solar/wind energy clients for years -- "It is much
cheaper save energy than it is to generate it." Greennovator
At 6:04 PM, May 16, 2007, Elji said...
Even with a purely economic point of view, I doubt CSS is aviable solution, because it can only work if there is a big CO2
emission, and a large storage facility at the same place. How
many places like that do we have? If we must transport CO2, I see
it totally undoable.


