Alexander Goerlach User Offline Alexander Goerlach
Berlin,
Germany
Level 3 Moderator Profil Level 100%
Date: May 07, 2007

Carbon Capture and Storage – a key technology to a sustainable reduction of CO2-emissions?

 
To the energy suppliers in Germany it is a given fact: The country will rely on its coal reserves within the coming decades. If not, then half of the land will have to be paved with wind wheels, says E.on CEO Wulf Bernotat in an interview with Welt am Sonntag.
 
The politics guidelines of the countries see it in a similar light – and so the Federal Ministry of Education and Research supports several programs to research on Carbon Capture and Storage, a technology that seperates CO2 in the combustion process before it enters the atmosphere. The trapped greenhouse gas is afterwards stored in hope of never to be diffused again. If we have to use coal for the energy mix in the near future we have to make sure that it is as little emissive as possible the agenda says.
 
Club of Pioneers is visiting a meeting on Carbon Capture and Storage (CSS) Wednesday 9th May in Leipzig. The panel discussion will be conducted by me. My colleague Anke will talk to the panellists before and after the discussion to get to know their view more detailed and report it back to you, our community. The meeting is organised by Geo Technologies, a research program of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research and the German Research Community (DFG).
 
Carbon capture and storage is the technical process which divides CO2 from the other chemical elements that are part of fossil fuel burning processes. Capturing CO2 can be applied to large point sources, such as fossil fuel or biomass energy facilities. There are several methods of capturing CO2. Technology for this venture is already available but the costs that increase with the enormous energy consumption during the capture are the main obstacle for applying this technology on a large scale.
 


Animated picture of a Carbon Storage system
 
CSS applied to a modern conventional power plant can reduced CO2 emissions up to 80-90%. The capturing and compressing CO2 on the other hand would increase the fuel needed in such power plant about 10-40%, scientists estimate. Economically spoken the costs of energy generated in power plants with CSS would raise about 30-60%, an increase no customer would be ready to pay.
 
However, Carbon Capture and Storage is seen as one credible approach to mitigate climate change.
 
The Storage of CO2 is a new area of research. There are several options of storage. The two mostly mentioned are the geological and the ocean storage. The approach of the researchers of Geo Technologies is about the geological approach exclusively. Geological Storage includes oil fields, gas fields, saline formations, unminable coals seams.
 
In theses cases various physical and geochemical trapping mechanisms would prevent the CO2 from escaping the surface. In the ocean storage on the other hand the approach of forming a CO2-lake on the ground of the sea and the approach of distributing it to the water in about 3000 meter depth can not guarantee the same security and long-term lasting of the CO2.
 
Grafic 1: The Association of German Engineers
 
Animation: climatechangeaction.blogspot.com
Rate this Post
32 Ratings
 
 
Comments

Comments

At 1:52 PM, May 08, 2007, walterallenhaxton said...
I think that Carbon Capture and Storage is a fake solution.
Eventually earth movements will release any co^2 that is stored
in this manner. This pushes the problem off in to the future
which might have some value but since we don't know when it will
come popping back up out of the ground we might be creating a
serious problem for the future. There is a lake in Africa
that does this naturally. Once in a while some of the CO^2 comes
up and kills a lot of people down stream. A better solution
would be to not use carbon based fuels. The universe uses
fusion power. We could use that or fission power. A great
way to store wind and other intermittent sources of power is
Hydrogen. It has many uses. I don't see why tidal power
needs to be restricted to the shore. There are tides over the
whole surface of the ocean. Of course harnessing sources like
that would require Hydrogen storage. Methane is a problem
too. Capturing it before it reaches the atmosphere and using it
as a fuel would create a bigger difference than CO^2 would. I
heard that it is 200 times as potent a greenhouse gas as CO^2.
Another idea just popped into my head. What about wave power.
They are all over the ocean. Harvesting that power would create a
tremendous amount of Hydrogen.
At 1:06 PM, May 16, 2007, Greennovator said...
I agree with walter that this type of CSS is a waste of resorces.
A far more viable carbon sequestration solution is "terra
preta". Google it or goto www.eprida.com for a look at a company
with amazing potential. Locking carbon up in the soil increases
moisture retention and increases crop yields (and thus CO2
absorption) thru natural microbial processes. As far as
methane goes, it has 21 times CO2's heat trapping potential, not
200. We definitely need more biogas systems for organic wastes
to keep the CH4 out of the atmosphere. Wave power has already
come a long way, with full scale test systems of the coast of
Portugal and Scotland. Hydrogen has a long way to go as an
energy storage medium (infrastructure, fuelcells, etc.) Fusion
(our Sun) is a far better option than fission, but I know that
the latter will probably needed in the interim until we can fully
transition to the truly renewable sources of
energy. Conservation must come with or before these changes as
I have told my solar/wind energy clients for years -- "It is much
cheaper save energy than it is to generate it." Greennovator
At 6:04 PM, May 16, 2007, Elji said...
Even with a purely economic point of view, I doubt CSS is a
viable solution, because it can only work if there is a big CO2
emission, and a large storage facility at the same place. How
many places like that do we have? If we must transport CO2, I see
it totally undoable.
 
Post a comment

Post a comment

Your comment